Volume 3, Number 5 / October issue 2017
Sharon Hudson
Assessing emotional intelligence: A literature review

The purpose of the literature review is to examine the empirical evidence associated with emotional intelligence (EI) measurement. A search of the periodical database PsychINFO and a Google Internet search produced studies associated with ability model, mixed model, and trait model approaches to assessment. The key search term ‘assessing emotional intelligence’ was not limited by date of publication. The emotional intelligence tests selected for review include the Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory, Emotional & Social Competence Inventory, Emotional & Social competence Inventory – University Edition, Genos Emotional Intelligence Inventory, Group Emotional Competency Inventory, Mayer-Salovey-Caruso EI Test, Schutte Self-Report Emotional Intelligence Scale, Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire, Work Group Emotional Intelligence Profile, and Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale. Emotional intelligence testing is applicable to both business and academic related performance to measure leadership ability and assess behavior. Theory links high emotional intelligence to enhanced performance, better outcomes, and improved mental status. Criticism of emotional intelligence testing is linked to consensus-based assessment and self-report measures. The complex constructs of emotional intelligence require a multifaceted approach of more than one measure and consideration of personality measures.
Keywords: assessing emotional intelligence

Cite this article:
Sharon Hudson. Assessing emotional intelligence: A literature review. Acta Scientiae et Intellectus, 3(5)2017, 17-25.


  1. Andrei, F., Mancini, G. Baldaro, B., Trombini, E., & Agnoli, S. (2014). A systematic review of the predictive utility of the trait emotional intelligence questionnaire (TEIQue). Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata, 271(62), 2-29.
  2. Austin, E. J., Saklofske, D. H., Huang, S. H. S., & McKenney, D. (2004). Measurement of trait emotional intelligence: testing and cross-validating a modified version of Schutte et al.’s (1998) measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 555-562. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00114-4
  3. Boyatzis, R.E. (n.d.). The creation of the emotional and social competency inventory (ESCI):
  4. Findings from a pilot study to achieve a higher psychometric standard with the ECI. Retrieved from
  5. Brackett, M. A., & Salovey, P. (2006). Measuring emotional intelligence with the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso emotional intelligence test (MSCEIT). Psicothema, 18, 34-41.
  6. Brannick, M. T., Wahl, M. M., & Goldin, S. B. (2011). Psychometrics of Mayer-Salovey-Caruso emotional intelligence test (MSCEIT) scores. Psychological Reports, 109(1), 327-337. doi:10.2466/03.04.PRO.109.4.327-337
  7. Cooper, A., & Petrides, K. V. (2010). A psychometric analysis of the trait emotional intelligence questionnaire-short form (TEIQue-SF) using item response theory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92(5), 449-457. doi:10.1080/00223891.2010.497426
  8. Dawda, D., & Hart, S.D. (2000). Assessing emotional intelligence: reliability and validity of the bar-on emotional quotient inventory (EQ-i) in university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 797-812.
  9. Druskat, V. U., & Wolff, S. B. (2001). Building the emotional intelligence of groups. On Emotional Intellgence (71-91). Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
  10. Ekermans, G., Saklofske, D.H., Austin, E., & Stough, C. (2011). Measurement invariance and differential item functioning of the Bar-On EQ-i:S measure over Canadian, Scottish, South African and Australian samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 286-290. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.004
  11. Emmerling, R. (2015). The group emotional competence (GEC) inventory. Retrieved from weis.html.
  12. Freudenthaler, H.H., Neubauer, A.C., Gabler, P., Scherl, W.G., & Rindermann, H. (2008).
  13. Testing and validating the trait emotional intelligence questionnaire (TEIQue) in a German-speaking sample. Personality and Individual Difference, 45, 673-678. doi:10.1016/j.paid.07.014
  14. Gignac, G. E., Palmer, B. R., Manocha, R., & Stough, C. (2005). An examination of the factor structure of the schutte self-report emotional intelligence (SSREI) scale via confirmatory factor analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1029-1042. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.03.014
  15. Jordan, P. J., & Lawrence, S. A. (2009). Emotional intelligence in teams: Development and initial validation of the short version of the workgroup emotional intelligence profile (WEIP-S). Journal of Management & Organization, 15(4), 452-469.
  16. Karim, J., & Weisz, R. (2010). Cross-cultural research on the reliability and validity of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso emotional intelligence tests (MSCEIT). Cross-Cultural Research, 44(4), 374-404. doi:10.1177/ 1069397110377603
  17. Li, T., Saklofske, D. H., Bowden, S. C., Yan, G., & Fung, T. S. (2012). The measurement invariance of the Wong and Law emotional intelligence scale (WLEIS) across three Chinese university student groups from Canada and China. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(4), 439-452. doi:10.1177/0734282912449449
  18. Libbrecht, N., De Beuckelaer, A., Lievens, F., & Rockstuhl, T. (2014). Measurement invariance of the Wong and Law emotional intelligence scale scores: Does the measurement structure hold across far Eastern and European countries? Applied Psychology: An International Review, 63(2), 223-237. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597. 2012.00513.x
  19. Oaklands College. (2010). Case study: Turning students into expert learners. Retrieved from
  20. Palmer, B. R., Manocha, R., Gignac, G., & Stough, C. (2003). Examining the factor structure of The Bar-On emotional quotient inventory with an Australian general population sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1191-1210. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00328-8
  21. Palmer, B. R., Stough, C., Harmer, R., & Gignac, G. (2009). The genos emotional intelligence inventory: A measure designed specifically for workplace applications. Assessing Emotional Intelligence: Theory, Research, and Applications (103-117). New York, NY: Springer.